That, at least, is the conclusion of a DEFRA study published
in March. It found that for very little
cost, UK businesses could produce just as much as they do today, while saving
£23 billion in costs.
Given our current economic troubles, it is surprising that
this hasn’t been headline news. The topic
is called “resource efficiency.” The UK
government has been trying to encourage firms to improve their resource
efficiency by providing advice and grants, and even the European Commission has
urged firms on, claiming that “Increasing resource efficiency will be key to securing growth and jobs”.
These claims are entirely realistic. There are multitudes of case studies
available through government agencies and in business school texts, and of
course many cases have never been documented. Just tackling the production of waste
products alone – without considering any other efficiency savings – could produce big
savings to the bottom line.
The fact is that the funding interventions from the
government have so far been very small – less than £100 million per year of the
Business Resource Efficiency and Waste scheme.
However, they indicate big potential – every £1 spent by the government
achieved an average £1.64 in additional sales and £3.20 in cost savings – and
those are the benefits in just one year.
Unfortunately, the budgets for this work are now being cut.
As the ENDS Report has observed, “government will have to
depend on businesses stepping up their own efforts independently, without
relying on public funds for advice and support.” Increasing landfill taxes are meant to
encourage firms to address their inefficiencies, but waste handling costs
represent only a tiny fraction of the true cost of waste. Moreover, there are many more inefficiencies
that have nothing to do with the waste stream.
When so many companies have tackled their waste stream, why
have so few put the same energy into efficiencies – that is, into not producing
the waste in the first place? It’s often
no one’s job – we assume our employees will identify and eliminate waste if
they can, but no one is tasked or measured on this. And why not?
Well – since the cost of producing waste, or working inefficiently, is almost never measured, those
in charge don’t realise it deserves an explicit place in their management
structure.
For those companies that grasp the opportunities in resource
efficiency, the prize will be higher profits, greater security, and growth. The government will no longer take the lead,
though it is a wonder that it was ever necessary. Given the size of the prize, it is time more
firms put resource efficiency on the CEO’s agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment